Cessna 172S N505LP accident near Culpeper, Virginia

Dec 22, 2020 · NTSB number ERA21LA092 · Final report

Probable cause

The pilot’s decision to land the airplane in crosswind conditions that exceeded the airplane’s maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity.

NTSB analysis

The purpose of the flight was for the pilot to practice crosswind landings, and she described experiencing gusty wind conditions on her arrival at the destination airport. She believed that the wind conditions that prevailed at the time would have resulted in a direct left crosswind of 20 knots (the wind conditions recorded by the airport’s automated weather observation system indicated that a crosswind of 16 knots, gusting to 29 knots prevailed about the time of the accident). While on final approach, and with 20° of flaps extended, she maintained a normal approach speed plus an additional 7 knots. During the landing flare, a gust of wind struck the airplane. The airplane then struck the ground, ballooned back into the air, and landed hard. After landing, she taxied to the ramp and secured it. The lower portion of the airplane’s fuselage was substantially damaged during the accident. The pilot reported that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures of the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

The Pilot’s Operating Handbook and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Approved Airplane Flight Manual specified the maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity for the airplane was 15 knots.

Text from the NTSB. Open the NTSB docket for ERA21LA092 for the full record.

Event

Date
Dec 22, 2020
Type
Accident
Place
Culpeper, Virginia
Nearest airport
Culpepper (CJR)
Highest injury
None
Weather
Visual (VMC)
Light
Day

Cessna 172S

N-number
N505LP
Category
Airplane
Year built
2000
Damage
Substantial
Operating rule
Part 91 (general aviation)
Purpose of flight
Personal

Other records under this N-number

From the NTSB aviation accident database: N-registered aircraft, events since 2008, data through Oct 28, 2026. The file is published monthly, so the latest weeks are incomplete and recent records can change. The official source is the NTSB aviation investigation search. CheckAero is independent and not affiliated with the NTSB.