Cessna 185A N1699Z and Taylorcraft BC-65 N23619 accident near Madras, Oregon

Dec 1, 2010 · NTSB number WPR11LA068 · Final report

Probable cause

The failure of both pilots to see and avoid the other airplane while in the traffic pattern to land, which resulted in a midair collision.

NTSB analysis

The propeller of a Taylorcraft airplane and the empennage of a Cessna airplane came in contact with each other while both aircraft were on final approach to the same runway. The pilot of the Cessna had completed a landing and performed a standard entry (left) onto the downwind leg of the traffic pattern. The pilot of the Taylorcraft was returning from a local area training flight and entered the downwind leg of the traffic pattern from a standard mid-field 45-degree entry. The Cessna pilot was announcing his position on the common traffic advisory frequency during each segment of the pattern; however, the pilot of the Taylorcraft could not hear the transmissions since his airplane was not equipped with a radio. Just prior to impact, the pilot of the Taylorcraft observed the empennage of the Cessna underneath the left wing of his airplane. The pilot of the Cessna never observed the Taylorcraft, but heard a loud bang come from the aft end of his airplane at impact. Both pilots were able to land their airplanes without further incident.

Text from the NTSB. Open the NTSB docket for WPR11LA068 for the full record.

Event

Date
Dec 1, 2010
Type
Accident
Place
Madras, Oregon
Nearest airport
Madras Municipal Airport (S33)
Highest injury
None
Weather
Visual (VMC)
Light
Day

Cessna 185A

N-number
N1699Z
Category
Airplane
Damage
Substantial
Operating rule
Part 91 (general aviation)
Purpose of flight
Personal

Taylorcraft BC-65

N-number
N23619
Category
Airplane
Damage
Minor
Operating rule
Part 91 (general aviation)
Purpose of flight
Instructional

From the NTSB aviation accident database: N-registered aircraft, events since 2008, data through Oct 28, 2026. The file is published monthly, so the latest weeks are incomplete and recent records can change. The official source is the NTSB aviation investigation search. CheckAero is independent and not affiliated with the NTSB.