Cessna Aircraft Co E162 N162CE accident near El Dorado, Kansas

Mar 19, 2009 · NTSB number CEN09FA220 · Final report

Probable cause

The failure of the Ballistic Recovery System to disconnect due to twisted attachment straps.

NTSB analysis

The pilot was conducting spin testing in an experimental, pre-production, light sport airplane. The airplane was equipped with a non-production Ballistic Recovery System (BRS) chute which was modified to allow for chute jettison after chute deployment. During a full aft center of gravity (CG) test flight, the airplane was placed in a left spin. The pilot attempted to recover from the spin but was unsuccessful. The pilot described the spin as "uncontrollable." After three turns the pilot elected to deploy the BRS, as per the briefed procedures. After BRS deployment, the airplane continued to spin, twisting the BRS chute attachment straps. The pilot attempted to jettison the chute, but could not due to the twisting of the straps. The parachute-equipped pilot remained with the airplane until it reached the ground in the BRS chute. The airplane was substantially damaged when it was drug by the chute in surface winds. The winds four minutes after the accident, 30 miles to the southwest, were reported as being at 14 knots, gusting to 23 knots. After the accident the manufacturer made design changes to the airplane's elevator, aileron, and rudder systems to improve the airplane's spin recovery capabilities.

Text from the NTSB. Open the NTSB docket for CEN09FA220 for the full record.

Event

Date
Mar 19, 2009
Type
Accident
Place
El Dorado, Kansas
Nearest airport
Cessna Aircraft Airport (CEA)
Highest injury
None
Weather
Visual (VMC)
Light
Day

Cessna Aircraft Co E162

N-number
N162CE
Category
Airplane
Damage
Substantial
Operating rule
Part 91 (general aviation)
Purpose of flight
Flight test

From the NTSB aviation accident database: N-registered aircraft, events since 2008, data through Oct 28, 2026. The file is published monthly, so the latest weeks are incomplete and recent records can change. The official source is the NTSB aviation investigation search. CheckAero is independent and not affiliated with the NTSB.